Why would, and perhaps more importantly how could we reasonably expect "Anything: Dylan" to NOT present more questions than answers? That would be like writing a book on intercontinental voyages featuring the Titanic.
While I haven't seen this film or its trailer(s) - I didn't even know it existed until today - I can't imagine it being marketed or presented as a definitive look into the man himself. But maybe I'm wrong, as a significant portion of your review seems to weigh the film against such declarations.
Citing those claims in the review would add some credibility to your critiques of them. Otherwise, the accusations of "masquerading" seem unfounded, and notions of "too perfect" and "diamond" seem to reflect your views more than the film's.
Thanks so much for reading! A good critic is only espousing their views so I definitely urge you to read other reviews about the films. Great critics like William Bibbiani and others have reflected as well on the movie's issues balancing the man and the legend.
James Mangold’s A Complete Unknown aims to explore Bob Dylan's early years, but it leaves the audience with more questions than answers. Timothée Chalamet portrays Dylan with swagger, but the film avoids delving into his personal struggles or motivations, making his character feel flat and enigmatic. The supporting cast, especially Monica Barbaro as Joan Baez, is more engaging, but even they lack depth. While the music performances are a highlight, the film follows familiar biopic formulas, making it feel less original. It’s visually appealing but doesn’t offer much substance for those wanting a deeper understanding of Dylan.
Why would, and perhaps more importantly how could we reasonably expect "Anything: Dylan" to NOT present more questions than answers? That would be like writing a book on intercontinental voyages featuring the Titanic.
While I haven't seen this film or its trailer(s) - I didn't even know it existed until today - I can't imagine it being marketed or presented as a definitive look into the man himself. But maybe I'm wrong, as a significant portion of your review seems to weigh the film against such declarations.
Citing those claims in the review would add some credibility to your critiques of them. Otherwise, the accusations of "masquerading" seem unfounded, and notions of "too perfect" and "diamond" seem to reflect your views more than the film's.
Thanks so much for reading! A good critic is only espousing their views so I definitely urge you to read other reviews about the films. Great critics like William Bibbiani and others have reflected as well on the movie's issues balancing the man and the legend.
James Mangold’s A Complete Unknown aims to explore Bob Dylan's early years, but it leaves the audience with more questions than answers. Timothée Chalamet portrays Dylan with swagger, but the film avoids delving into his personal struggles or motivations, making his character feel flat and enigmatic. The supporting cast, especially Monica Barbaro as Joan Baez, is more engaging, but even they lack depth. While the music performances are a highlight, the film follows familiar biopic formulas, making it feel less original. It’s visually appealing but doesn’t offer much substance for those wanting a deeper understanding of Dylan.
For a detailed parents’ guide, check out my full review here: https://parentconcerns.com/a-complete-unknown-2024-parents-guide/